Tantrum?

Smoke from fires is causing a lot of haze and unhealthy air.

This website provides data and maps about air quality and fires:  https://www.airnow.gov/about-airnow/

Click to enlarge.

 

Air quality appears to be very bad in the northern Great Plains.

People are being advised to stay indoors in Bismarck, North Dakota.

 

Where is the smoke coming from?

Canada.

Prince Albert vicinity

 

Further northwest

Highway 58 fire(s).

Readers can decide for themselves whether these hot spots (fires) are occurring naturally...

... or not.

 

Mainstream media has reported about the fires...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/weather/2025/05/31/canada-wildfires-smoke-air-quality-midwest/83962981007/

 

But they have not reported about the cause, or even mentioned the website or data shown at the top of this MFP article.  This is all they report...

UPDATE, June 2, 2025...

One day later, the Highway 58 fire(s) have spread some, but are largely diminished.  This is in a remote part of of northwestern Alberta, Canada.

 

The Winefred Lake fires are essentially out.

 

 

Those fires happened in a more developed part of Alberta.
 

Click to enlarge.

Oil Field

The Winefred Lake oil field, shown above, is near Conklin, which is in the eastern part of the Athabasca Oil Sands region.

Editorial

Oil and gas burn easily, and those who are in the business of extracting them from the land are typically very careful about avoiding ignition sources.

The Winefred Lake fire(s) occurred yesterday right in the middle of an oil field, and they formed a long, oval shape extending a considerable distance from the extraction equipment.

Today, those fires are out.  Undoubtedly, personnel in the Conklin area quickly extinguished them.

How did those fires start?  Do the oil field employees know?  Do they have ideas about it?  Did they see anything suspicious?  Have they been interviewed by the press or media?  Has anyone even talked to them?

Given the extent of the environmental impact these "fires" are having, it seems like reporters would investigate more.  Oh, wait!  That's precisely what the Michiganian Free Press is doing!

 

UPDATE, June 4, 2025...

In a flat, treeless environment like the Canadian Great Plains,¹

... how do fires (the brown splotches)...

... propagate hundreds of feet?

... or thousands of feet,

... without affecting the grass in between?  

Even the satellite photo in USA Today (above) shows discrete fires great distances apart, ...with nothing burned between them.  They are all separate fires.

Click and enlarge to view between the fires.  Where is the char?

How do these fires get started in the first place when they are hundreds of miles apart in remote areas with few roads?

 

Zipidy DEW ...  Duh??

DEW stands for Direct Energy Weapon (artistic rendering).

 

UPDATE, June 5, 2025...

This is ridiculous.  Wildfires do not jump across water and spread like this.

Click to enlarge.

¹ Actually, the following photo is a Google Earth "Street View" of a road on the eastern side of Amisk Lake near some of the fires.  These fires are generally in areas like this, not plains.

 

UPDATE, June 6, 2025...

If an earth-orbiting satellite were being used to start these fires, and the direction of the beam depended upon the orientation of the satellite, that satellite would need to be moved to adjust its target.

Reorienting a satellite requires time and energy, and it seems reasonable consecutive targets would be close together.

The satellite's orbital dynamics would be different than the rotational dynamics of the earth, and it seems reasonable they would interact to create characteristic patterns.

In the opinion of the MFP, the patterns of these fires are extremely suspicious and cannot be considered to be naturally occurring.

 

The MFP calls for the immediate suspension of these activities and the arrest of those who are perpetrating them.  Those misusing equipment and facilities owned by the American people must be subjected to military justice.  This is unacceptable and inexcusable.

 

 

Bewitched

Editorial: Close But No Cigar

This meme (right) is floating around the Internet.

Does it report facts, or does it tell people what they want to hear?

It says, "It's OVER."

What's over?  The meme does not say.  It leaves that notion to the mind of the beholder.

It says, "The United States CORPORATION has been DISSOLVED."

Which "United States"?  There have been many entities with that name.

Is it referring to the United States municipal, civil-service corporation owned by the Pope?  That corporation became defunct on October 1, 2024, and it no longer exists.  It is undergoing audits and being liquidated, so that appears to be true.

The meme says, "Donald J. Trump is now COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of a sovereign republic, not a fake corporate entity."

What is "Donald J. Trump"?  Is it a fake entity?  Is it a legal fiction?

What does the "J." stand for?  "John"?  Could it be "Jeremy", "Julius," or perhaps "Jabberwocky"?

What is a "commander-in-chief," and why is it in ALL CAPS?

What does the word "sovereign" mean, and what does it imply here?

What is a "republic," and can it be sovereign?  Has there ever been a republic?  When?  Who created it and who ran it?  What was its purpose and what did it do?

What is "Crown Maritime Law"?  The meme says it is DEAD.  Was it living at some point?  How can "law" be alive?

What is "Common Law"?  Is the meme talking about American Common Law, British Common Law, or some other form of "common law"?

When people see the word "free," what do they believe it means?  Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."

In a world full of lies, which lie is the greatest?

The meme says, "The U.S. was NEVER a republic -- it was a CORPORATION."  That is true, but the States of America (1787) was a republic and operated under The Constitution for the united States of America until 1861, and it was not incorporated.  The U.S. corporation was, and is today, operated by "The Firm", but as a democracy not a republic.

The meme says, "Every contract, every court ruling, every law passed under that structure?  INVALID.  What we were living in was a legal illusion, a prison of paperwork and manipulation -- and it's collapsing right now."

Yes, the Pope's MUNICIPAL, civil-service corporation is collapsing, but the British Territorial, "military" (mercenary force, actually) corporation is operating full-steam, and it is receiving the assets of the liquidated entity, purportedly for the "missing" priority creditors (the Americans) -- but we aren't missing and we know exactly what is going on.  We are not deceived.  Not anymore.

 

Source

What is "Ezra A. Cohen"?  Is it a legal fiction?  What does the "A." stand for?  Whose photo is that next to it?

Is there a living man named Ezra Cohen?  Does Wikipedia say something about him?

The Wikipedia article says, "Ezra Cohen, also known as Ezra Cohen-Watnick, is an American intelligence official..."

Is he American, or is he a U.S. Citizen?

It says he was trained by the Central Intelligence Agency.

It also says he earned a Juris Doctor degree.  That means he is an attorney.

BAR attorneys work for the British Monarch.

 

Was the meme at the top of this article purportedly written by an attorney who was trained by the Central Intelligence Agency and worked for a British Crown corporation?

Should we believe what it says?  Any of it?

 

The Brits are trying to hold onto their fraud by attempting to inhabit the missing Federal Republic.

In the opinion of the MFP, that meme is an attempt to float the words "sovereign" and "republic" in front of the public to get people used to the idea there is going to be restoration of a long-lost Republic.

That may happen, but it won't be done by the Brits.  Americans are the only ones who can reinhabit the American Federal Republic.

The MFP wrote about this earlier in the year:  "Well, There It Is..."

 

UPDATE, May 23, 2025...

Now these same Villains have offered to make their theft of our Federal Republic official by pretending to restore and rebuild it, but leaving themselves in control of it, and benefiting from their usurpation of our delegated powers and still in control of our trademarks and patents and corporations and public buildings and other infrastructure.

Think of it like this --- a man rapes his Employer's wife and claims to be her husband, settles in and strips all the assets of the woman and her children, leaves them destitute, then comes back forty years later and offers to marry her --- and make the forced, immoral relationship official, so that he can further strip the assets of the family and claim the powers of pater familias.

Perhaps this analogy is finally strong enough so everyone can understand why we are not jumping for joy and readily accepting the offers being made by British Territorial U.S. Citizens to "restore" our Federal Republic --- which they have commandeered, broken, and dishonored beyond any recognition.

Excerpted from...

Article 5368, International Public Notice: How? Why? Be Advised, May 22, 2025.

The Firm

Source

"Great Britain" is a company, not a country.

... the English people have been conquered and abused for a very long time, by a combination of Continental European interests. French heirs own their land and soil, while Germans control their sea and air jurisdictions. The native peoples of the British Isles have suffered precisely the same fate as Native Americans in this country, absent the open air internment camps known as "reservations"; the native Brits simply haven't recognized the severity of their condition until now...

It continues:

As it turns out, "Great Britain" is a Company, not a country, and the whole idea that Englishmen and Scots and Irish and Welsh were suddenly transformed into "British" is just another part of the Great Fraud against us all. Even the idea that "British" land exists, is a misnomer and misconception. Here's the actual history: 1066 A.D. the English were overrun by the French and all their land and soil came under French possession and ownership down to the last goat inventoried by William the Conqueror, so what you [John Chapman, a U.S. Citizen, who the letter is addressed to] are misrepresenting as "English" was French even at the time of the Magna Carta, which was the product of French heirs of the Conquest, not Englishmen.

Another kind of "conquest" in a material and commercial sense happened when misguided persons imported William of Orange and put him on what could have been left of the English throne and that led to Queen Mary, a German, being adopted as the "British" Monarch. Germans have ruled over the "British" ever since and the "British" label represents denigrated English, Scotch, Irish, and Welshmen who are held in a form of perpetual indentured servitude known as "British Citizenship", while their assets, including their land and labor are commandeered as collateral backing the debts of the Great Britain Company and British Crown Corporation, otherwise known as "the Firm".  [Emphasis in original]

Those excerpts are part of an article by the Fiduciary of The United States of America, unincorporated.  Readers can view the full article here...

Article 5361, International Public Notice: From the Fiduciary Concerning England and Our Federation, May 17, 2025.

 Here is a related article...

Article 5363, International Public Notice: Alas, Poor England!, May 18, 2025.

So, some French people own the land and soil jurisdictions and Germans control sea and air jurisdictions, and the poor English, Scottish, Irish (Northern) and Welsh people have nothing.

Many other peoples around the world have similar problems, as described in the articles.

Blue Light

(Source)

Learn more about this over at the MFP Publisher's faith blog...

https://www.undeserving.me/2021/07/root-cause.html

Peacekeepers

The Peacekeeping Task Force (PKTF) is a part of The United States of America, Unincorporated.

They recently published a brochure explaining some common misconceptions.

Click to enlarge

 

Page 2

 

Page 3 of 3

 

Readers can examine the brochure for themselves and make up their own minds.

Donald Trump's "Gold"

The man who posts Anna von Reitz's articles for her on her website posts them on his own blog first, where he runs his business of selling precious metals.

The above image is from one of his posts...

http://www.paulstramer.net/2025/04/gold-to-12000-mar-lago-accords-could.html

What Mr. Trump is holding in that photograph looks like gold, but it cannot be gold.  It is probably gold-painted plastic.

Gold is over nineteen (19) times denser than water.  If that thing Mr. Trump is holding were solid gold, it would weigh about 25 pounds and he would not be able to hold it with just his fingers.

This weighs 25 pounds and I have to grip it with my full hand...

 "Let him who will be deceived be deceived."

 

Anna reported during her webinar last Monday (4/7/25) that Mr. Trump lost his bid to lay a claim on our (the Americans) land, supposedly "for us."  He lost because he was not able to establish "standing" in the World Court.

Apparently he tried to base that on a 1966 New York birth certificate.  That would make him 59 years old.

Anna reported he was born in Bavaria, which makes him German, not American.

Here is a transcript of the relevant part...

Mr. Trump had no standing in the issue of the land and soil; that's why he lost.  He also lost because he was apparently born in Bavaria and was trying to pass off a nineteen sixty six birth certificate from New York.  And we all know that Donald Trump is about ten years older than me, so...

[Teri]:  They described him as seventy eight during the inauguration.

[Anna]:  Yeah.  So, he's at least ten years older than me and was not born in 1966, which would be ten years younger than me.  So, obviously there's something going on in terms of Trump's birthright status, there's something going on in terms of his identity, and there's something going on in terms of the claims that they're making that, just as I've said from day one, they don't have standing to make these claims.

...

He wasn't able to maintain a position in court because of that.

This has been going on during the last month and a half, according to Anna in that discussion.

Here is a link to the specific webinar...

The American States Assembly April 7, 2025 Webinar (timestamp 1:13:40)

TASA Webinars for April, 2025 page (if that link does not work)

Rumble link:  https://rumble.com/v6ru3tf-the-american-states-assemblies-weekly-webinar-series-4072025.html

UPDATE, April 15, 2025...

Here it is in "article" form...

Article 5333, International Public Notice: Continued Deceit and Obfuscation, April 14, 2025.

Editorial: Cookie

The Midland Mall has a new shop that sells baked goods.  I have been purchasing very tasty chocolate chunk cookies there.  They sell for $3.00.  That's three "dollars" defined as Federal Reserve Notes (FRN).

Just as it matters what specific "United States" we are talking about, it matters what "dollar" we are referring to.

Nathan will tell you, a dollar is equivalent to one hundred (100) pennies.  I introduced Nathan in the Nathanomics post last June.

The cookie list price is actually 2.99.  Since the store owner has a State of Michigan "sales tax license," he has the privilege of sending that government-services-provider franchise six percent (6%) of the "income" his "Limited Liability Company" (LLC) corporation receives for each cookie.  Consequently, I have to provide him with four FRNs and he gives me 83 cents in change, probably as three quarters, a nickel and three pennies.

People consider pennies pretty worthless these days, but they used to buy a lot.  A penny is actual money.  Money has intrinsic value.

A penny is made of copper.  That copper can be made into copper wire, which can be used to make an electric motor.

An FRN is made of fiber, which can be used to light a cigar.

d.i.s.c.l.o.s.u.r.e.

Last month, the MFP reported the American Federation Dollar (AFD) had been launched.  That particular "dollar" is valued at 1/10th the daily spot price of gold.  Given that the current spot price of  gold is $3000 per ounce, one AFD is exchangeable for 300 FRNs.

As Nathan knows, each American Federation "Dollar" is equivalent to one hundred (100) pennies.  If he were to collect 100 pennies from his sock drawer at home, he would use them to trade for one AFD, and he would do some more arithmetic and determine that one of those pennies is worth 3 FRNs, given the exchange rate, above.

If the bakery shop owner were to comprehend this, he would accept one of Nathan's pennies for a tasty cookie because he would be able to use the pennies his business generates to acquire AFDs.  He would not be interested in cigar-lighting material.

Are you confused yet?  I guarantee Nathan isn't.

In a world of AFD "dollars" a penny will buy a tasty cookie, and that is what is coming.

People who correct their political status back to what it was when they were born are being given (yes, thaaat's right, ... given) 5280 AFDs per month, which they will be able to start spending soon.  This is restitution for The Great Fraud that has been going on for six generations.

Eventually, everyone else's pocketbooks will force them to wake up and start doing their homework, as the FRN/USD¹ "price of gold" skyrockets and the digits in their bank accounts buy less and less.

It would be wise to do that before the "stampede".

 

UPDATE, April 25, 2025...

¹ Added the link, for convenience.

Podcast

Some members of The Michigan Assembly were interviewed today on The American States Assemblies Podcast by Tammy Healy, including the publisher of the Michiganian Free Press.

 

Apologies for the MFP publisher's video.  The host was using a different videoconferencing application than the Assembly usually uses.

"Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms" Not In The Constitutions?

The Federal Government and their franchises presume to have authority over the manufacture, transportation and sale of alcohol, tobacco and firearms.

Where do they get that authority?

Are those words in the Constitution?  Any of the Constitutions?

Readers can look for themselves.

The American Federation Dollar (AFD) Is Launched

WILMINGTON, Del. - Feb. 7, 2025 - PRLog -- The American Federation Treasury proudly announces the official launch of the American Federation Dollar (AFD), a groundbreaking gold-backed digital currency engineered to provide a stable, secure, and transparent alternative to traditional fiat currencies. Now officially listed on the Saint Crown Exchange, the AFD ushers in a new era of financial sovereignty, economic stability, and global accessibility.

A Gold-Backed Digital Currency for Trust and Stability

The AFD is lawfully backed by over $2 trillion in gold reserves, securely audited and stored in internationally recognized vaults. Each AFD token is pegged to 1/10th the daily spot price of gold, offering users a reliable hedge against inflation and the volatility of fiat currencies and speculative cryptocurrencies.

Key Advantages of the AFD:

• Gold-Backed Stability – Each token derives value from physical gold, ensuring a dependable store of value.
• Blockchain Transparency – AFD transactions operate on an open-source blockchain ledger, ensuring traceability, security, and efficiency.
• Global Liquidity – AFD is exchangeable with major fiat currencies and digital assets via the Saint Crown Exchange.
• Legal Compliance – The currency adheres to global financial regulations, ensuring legitimacy and financial security.

Revolutionary Features of the AFD:

• Massive Reserve Backing – Audited in 2024, AFD is supported by over $2 trillion in gold reserves.
• Decentralized Governance – AFD token holders can participate in policy proposals and system upgrades.
• Advanced Security & Scalability – Utilizing state-of-the-art encryption and infrastructure, the AFD supports millions of daily transactions.

Saint Crown Exchange Listing

The AFD's listing on the Saint Crown Exchange (https://exchange.saintcrown.org/) enables seamless global transactions. Users can buy, sell, and trade AFD tokens in real-time, ensuring market liquidity and ease of adoption.

For more information, see the full press release here.

 

The American Federation of States Fiduciary's comments are available here...

Article 5269, It's Official: The American Federation Dollar is Launched, February 9, 2025.

Saint Crown Industrial Loan Co Bank is an "Industrial Loan Company" or "Industrial Bank," which may be owned by non-financial institutions and provides niche financial services (Wikipedia).

 

Manor House

Imagine a Landlord with significant property.

Imagine the people he hires to maintain the house and the grounds.  Are they the Landlord's employees?

There are a Butler, under-butlers, footmen, maids, nannies, cooks, groundskeepers, laborers and scullery maids.  The Butler is in charge and runs the house for the Landlord.

What if the employees tied up the Landlord and locked him in the cellar?  What if they then proceeded to do whatever they wanted?

What would result?

Is Mr. Trump the Butler?  Are the employees respecting their employer and fulfilling their contracts?

Is the Landlord free and out of the basement?

What should be happening?  What is actually happening?

 

Who is the Landlord?

Is the Landlord in charge, or are the employees?

Are YOU the Landlord?

 

UPDATE, February 9, 2025...

Article 5268, International Public Notice: The Choice is Yours, February 9, 2025.

UPDATE, March 7, 2025...

Article 5306, International Public Notice: Worldwide Dependency, March 6, 2025.

UPDATE, March 13, 2025...

Article 5311, International Public Notice: Americans Get the Facts, March 12, 2025.

WTF

Someone in The Michigan Assembly found this on the Internet.  Examine it carefully by clicking on the image.

Here is the link:

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/OE015146/filing-history

People in the Assembly forwarded it to the Fiduciary of The United States of America, unincorporated, and she included it in one of her recent articles...

 Article 5258, International Public Notice: You Heard It Here First, February 4, 2025.

What is there to prevent anyone from creating a "legal fiction," which is what a corporation is, with any name they want?  What is preventing them from creating one in the name of a country?  What about the name of an individual man or woman?  What if they did that and then passed themselves off as that man or woman and proceeded to steal everything they owned?

Nothing.

It happens a lot, and has been happening for a long time.

The only thing preventing this kind of behavior is honest people being aware of what is going on and standing up and crying foul.

 

Cousins

George Washington and King George III were cousins.

From AVR #5232, International Public Notice: Disappearing States of States...

George Washington, besides leading the American Forces to victory on the battlefield was: King George's Cousin, the largest landowner in the country, and if they stopped to think about it, they would have realized that "Commander-in-Chief", like the office of "President" is a private office associated with business corporations, not the proper military of a country.

We were all so young then and mostly ignorant and unsteady on our feet as "free, sovereign, and independent states" all the glitz and glitter and decorum and fantastical rigamarole associated with doing business with the British King, much less the Pope, was overwhelming for all but a very few men --- Franklin, Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, Madison --- all but Franklin being Bar Attorneys or Counselors of Law.

We can guarantee that 99.9% of Americans never conceived of the Revolutionary War as a gigantic land grab and Treaty evasion, but from the safe distance of two centuries, it's easy to see that one of the end results was King George skipping out on his Treaty obligations to certain Native Tribes, most especially the Lenape and the Delawares, and George Washington charging happily through the Cumberland Gap.

So the Office of President, like the Office of "Commander in Chief" are business offices associated with corporations and have never been anything else. The convention of having the President of the United States of America Company also serve as the President of the United States Company was convenient -- right up until very recently, when, without the existence of the UNITED STATES, INC., we are left wondering exactly what form of "United States" Donald Trump is "President" of?

Did they go to Zimbabwe and gin up a "United States, Incorporated" again?  [emphasis added]

What else have people not been told?

The rest of the article is here.

Find all of Anna's articles here.  The newest ones are at the very bottom.

Fraud Map

Click to enlarge.

The American people have been trapped in the middle of a 160-year fraud.

The American Federation Fiduciary just published another article describing it while a particular man moves forward with being "inaugurated" on Monday into an office of a defunct and liquidated foreign corporation.

The new article is here...

Article 5221, International Public Notice: The Great Kingdom of Babble, January 18, 2025.

Readers can refer to the above slide as they consider the article.

Editorial: How To Look Presentable On Video

Those who are participating in Land Jurisdiction Government are doing so over the Internet.  That means they must present themselves on a video camera.

People are used to seeing Media "talking heads" read the news.  They know what looks right, but when it comes to doing it themselves they generally do not know where to start.

That is the purpose of this editorial, to help people present themselves in flattering ways so others might take them seriously.  The Public can be very critical and are likely to dismiss a presentation if it looks sub-standard to what they are used to seeing.

This is what we should be aiming for...

Try to do what the professionals do.

Filling the frame of the picture gives the audience a good view of our body language, which conveys the most information when we communicate in person.  Body language is the reason why video works so well and we should take advantage of that when we are speaking or participating in a discussion.

Showing a lot of space above our head not only wastes screen area we could be using, it makes us look like a clown.  In the language of film/television, a lot of headspace creates an expectation that something is going to fall on our head.  Letting the top of our head almost touch the top of the screen is good.

Professional newsreaders are reading what they are saying.  There is a teleprompter giving them words and the camera lens is right behind it, which makes them appear to be looking into the lens and at the audience.  We do not have teleprompters, but we can do things to put our camera as close as possible to what we are reading or looking at.

Our Camera

I readily admit I generally do not even look people in the eye when I am speaking to them in person, and I do not like being on camera either, but it is part of the job.

When I looked for a camera to purchase, I found this...

The cable attached to the camera can be adjusted to position the lens anywhere in front of my computer screen, and it is quite small so it does not block much.  I can position what I am reading just below the lens so it appears I am close to reading from a teleprompter.

It's not perfect because there are generally videos of other people on my screen and I might be looking at them down in the corner as I am speaking, but it is a useful tool.

 

Lighting

Web cameras are pretty good at capturing reasonable video with relatively little light, but the more light we can provide the better we will look.

Here is my setup with just the light from my desk lamp.  That camera is doing a great job with such a small amount of light, but the quality is grainy and the side of my head is in shadow.  So is the back corner of the room.  Notice the annoying reflection of my computer monitor in my glasses...

 

Here is my setup with all lights on, including the desk lamp.  The lamp is a "warm" color and the other lights are all "cool" because I had daylight coming in a window from the left during the Autumn and I wanted the same color.  I can adjust the color of my lights...

Notice the reflection of the computer screen in my glasses is gone.  The rest of the lights overpower it.

 

Here is a video describing "three-point lighting," which is what I am doing...

My office is rather small and nowhere near as big as what is shown in the video.  Things don't have to be perfect.  I adapted my gear to my situation.

 

Here is my "key light" alone.  I have a "soft box" on it and have to keep the intensity down because it is very close to me in my small environment...

 

Here is my "fill light" alone.  I have a "soft box" on that one, too, and am bouncing it off the wall to reduce its intensity and diffuse the light more...

 

And here is my "back light" or "hair light" alone.  I do not have much hair, but happen to have a beard right now because it is Winter in Michigan...

Our Background

What we have in our background says a lot about us.

I have some things in my background that speak about me.

I love maps and the globe brings some context into what we are doing as we reconstruct our government.

The items on the wall are from my engineering career, and they were there before I ever learned about our political status or considered doing any web video.

The flag covers up a dark door that is distracting, and very importantly it signifies I am a man of peace and owed my unalienable rights, including my rights to free speech and to peaceably assemble.

People don't necessarily need to invest in special lights like I did, but understanding the concepts can lead to clever fixes and better presentations.

I hope this has been helpful to readers.